Tholi
PRODUCT COMPARISON

Tholi and mainstream browsers

Compare the built-in workflows in Chrome, Edge, Vivaldi, and Tholi.

BUILT-IN CAPABILITY MATRIX

What can each product complete on its own?

✓Built in or currently verified×No complete built-in workflow
Scroll horizontally to see every product →
CapabilityChromeEdgeVivaldiTholi
Group related contentName groups and separate tasksYesYesYesYes
Two pages side by sideView two pages in one windowYesYesYesYes
Three or more live items togetherKeep adding usable content to one workspaceNoNoYesYes
Multiple profiles for sign-insSeparate work and personal sessionsYesYesYesYes
Task-based saved workspacesReturn to the content for a taskNoYesYesYes
Free 2D placement and zoomNot limited to split-screen templatesNoNoNoYes
Web, files, and notes in one spaceKeep visible spatial relationshipsNoNoNoYes
Select multiple sources for AIChoose several sources from the current taskNoNoNoYes
Pin AI results beside sourcesRecover analysis context by positionNoNoNoYes

Checked August 27, 2026. This table compares complete built-in workflows without extensions. “No” does not include operating-system windows, third-party extensions, or experimental features.

View official sources
CHOOSE THE RIGHT TOOL

More context makes spatial work more useful.

Tholi fits when you
  • Read several webpages and files together
  • Compare, extract, record, and return to tasks
  • Want to give several sources to AI at once
  • Need separate work and personal website sessions
A conventional browser is enough when you
  • Mainly search and read one page at a time
  • Rarely preserve several task scenes
  • Do not need positions and relationships remembered
  • Prioritize mature sync and extension ecosystems